Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Negligence Case — Sets Aside Compensation Award Due to Limitation Bar. Suit for Compensation for Death Due to Electrocution Filed Beyond Limitation Period of One Year Under Article 82 of Limitation Act, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a suit for compensation filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) against the appellants (defendants), the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and its officers, for the death of two family members due to electrocution on 9-6-1990. The plaintiffs claimed that on that date, the deceased father and brother came into contact with a live wire while in a field, resulting in their deaths. The suit was filed on 27-10-1994 seeking Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation. The defendants did not file a written statement. The trial court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation under Article 82 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which prescribes a one-year period for suits for compensation for wrongful act resulting in death. The first appellate court reversed this finding, holding the suit within limitation, and decreed the suit with compensation. The High Court in second appeal examined the limitation issue. It noted that the deaths occurred on 9-6-1990 and the suit was filed on 27-10-1994, beyond one year. The court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the limitation period should run from the date of knowledge of the cause of action, as Article 82 specifically provides for one year from the date of death. The court also noted that the plaintiffs did not seek any extension under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the decree of the first appellate court, and restored the trial court's dismissal of the suit. The court did not examine the merits of negligence or compensation.

Headnote

A) Limitation Act - Suit for Compensation for Wrongful Act Resulting in Death - Article 82 - Period of Limitation - The suit for compensation for death due to electrocution must be filed within one year from the date of death. The court held that the suit filed on 27-10-1994 for deaths occurring on 9-6-1990 was beyond the prescribed period of one year and thus barred by limitation. (Paras 5-8)

B) Electricity Law - Negligence - Compensation for Electrocution Death - The first appellate court found the defendants negligent in maintaining electricity supply, but the High Court did not examine this issue as the appeal was allowed on limitation alone. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit for compensation for death due to electrocution was barred by limitation under Article 82 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and whether the first appellate court erred in holding the suit within limitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Decree of first appellate court set aside. Suit dismissed as barred by limitation. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Limitation Act
  • 1963
  • Article 82
  • Suit for compensation for wrongful act resulting in death
  • Period of limitation one year
  • Date of death as starting point
  • Negligence of electricity company
  • Burden of proof
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 242

Second Appeal No.176 of 2017

2017-09-21

A.S. Chandurkar, J.

Shri S. V. Purohit for appellants, Shri U. J. Deshpande for respondent Nos.1 to 5

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Others

Smt. Jamirshaha Jabbarshah and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against decree of first appellate court awarding compensation for death due to electrocution.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of decree for compensation on ground of limitation.

Filing Reason

Suit for compensation for death of two family members due to electrocution.

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed suit as barred by limitation; first appellate court reversed and decreed suit.

Issues

Whether the suit for compensation for death due to electrocution was barred by limitation under Article 82 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the suit was filed beyond one year from the date of death and thus barred by limitation. Respondents argued that limitation should run from date of knowledge of cause of action.

Ratio Decidendi

A suit for compensation for wrongful act resulting in death must be filed within one year from the date of death under Article 82 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The date of knowledge of the cause of action is not relevant for this article.

Judgment Excerpts

The suit was filed on 27-10-1994. The date of death is 9-6-1990. The suit was thus beyond the period of one year from the date of death. Article 82 of the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes a period of one year for a suit for compensation for wrongful act resulting in death.

Procedural History

Suit filed on 27-10-1994 for compensation for deaths on 9-6-1990. Trial court dismissed suit as barred by limitation. First appellate court reversed and decreed suit. Defendants filed second appeal in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Limitation Act, 1963: Article 82
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Negligence Case — Sets Aside Compensation Award Due to Limitation Bar. Suit for Compensation for Death Due to Electrocution Filed Beyond Limitation Period of One Year Under Article 82 of Limitation Act...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise Between Spouses — Section 482 CrPC. Settlement Reached Between Husband and Wife Leads to Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohi...