Search Results for "Exemption Scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Exemption Scheme"

1184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1184 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MODVAT Credit Denial Under Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Final Products Not Eligible for Credit.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioners, Atlas Automotive Components Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

30 Jan 2015

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

13 Feb 2019

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Safety Regulation and Government Exemption Order Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court addressed whether Regulation 116 is ultra vires, if transfer schemes protect unqualified employees, and the arbitrariness of a Government Order granting exemptions from safety qualifications.

18 Feb 2022

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed in the High Court of Kerala challenging Regulation 116 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measure...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in EPF Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Computer consultancy not covered under notification dated 17th May 1971 extending Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to establishments rendering expert services.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal that it...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Software Export Tax Exemption Case — ITAT's Factual Findings on Export Turnover and Profit Computation Upheld. The court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the ITAT's findings were factual and based on evidence.

12 Feb 2014

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Due to Procedural Irregularity. Rule 6(2) proviso requiring pre-deposit of 50% of disputed tax before filing declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 read down as directory, not mandatory.

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Nabeel Construction Pvt. Ltd., engaged in construction services, was subjected to an investigation by the Directorate General of GST I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal, Holding That Appeal Against CESTAT Order on Exemption Notification Conditions Lies Before High Court Under Section 130 Customs Act. The dispute over unutilized duty-free imported materials after cessation of manufacturing does not involve determination of rate of duty or value of goods for assessment, thus High Court has jurisdiction.

1 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore-1 (appellant) and M/s Motorola India Ltd. (respondent) regarding the proper...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)