Search Results for "Customs tariff"

311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in CBI Case Due to Settlement Commission Immunity — Criminal Conspiracy and Corruption Charges Quashed Against Company Granted Immunity Under Central Excise Act, 1944 and Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing and exporting cosmetics from a unit in Kandla Spec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2031 OF 2018

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations and Demand for Customs Duty in Sugar Export Cases. Non-compliance with export obligation due to government-imposed export ban constitutes force majeure, and demand for duty with interest cannot be sustained.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies engaged in sugar trading and export, challenging the cancellation of advance authorizatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Steamer Agent Challenging Port Trust Circular Limiting Storage Duration. Circular Held Valid as Administrative Measure to Decongest Port, Not a Tariff Fixation.

The appellant, Maheshwary Handling Agency Private Limited, a steamer agent, challenged a circular dated 31st August 1998 issued by the Traffic Manager...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Anti-Dumping Investigation in Seamless Tubes Case — Designated Authority Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Terminating Investigation Under Customs Tariff Rules, 1995.

The petitioner, M/s. ISMT Limited, a manufacturer of seamless tubes and pipes, filed an anti-dumping application before the Designated Authority alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rescuing Accused and Causing Hurt to Customs Officers in Santhal Parganas. Sea Customs Act, 1878 Applicable to Scheduled Area Through Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947, and Inspectors Had Authority to Arrest and Seize Cloves as Prohibited Goods.

The matter arose from an incident on 13 December 1961 at Pakur Railway Station in the Santhal Parganas, Bihar. Nazir Mian, one of the appellants, was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Demand Notice Issued to Former Director for Recovery of Company's Customs Dues. Director Not Personally Liable for Tax Arrears Under Section 142 of Customs Act, 1962, Absent Statutory Provision.

The case involved a writ petition filed by Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old former director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later known as PDG Infotec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...