Search Results for "Conflicting decrees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Conflicting decrees"

140 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Rent Control Matter — Tenant's Subletting and Denial of Title Not Proved. Held that mere use of premises by family members does not constitute subletting under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and denial of landlord's title must be unequivocal and in good faith.

5 Feb 2018

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the legal heirs of the original tenant, Mangilal Mishrimal Bafna, against the respondents, who...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Partition Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Trial Court's Rejection Quashed on Payment of Costs.

8 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Sri S. Indushekhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25/11/202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proving the execution and validity of the agreement to sell, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

2 Apr 2024

The appellant, Zainab Rafiullah Shaikh, was the original defendant No.3 in a suit for specific performance filed by the respondent, Puthenveedu Joseph...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Impleadment in Admiralty Suit - Commercial Appellate Division's Order Setting Aside Addition of Gulf Petroleum FZC as Defendant Maintained. Maritime Claim for Mis-delivery of Cargo Under Section 4(1)(f) of Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 Alleged by Bank as Bill of Lading Holder.

23 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from an Admiralty Suit filed by Banque Cantonale de Geneve (Respondent Bank) against the owners of the vessel M.V. Polaris Galaxy (A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

2 Aug 2017

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tenancy Rights of Legal Heirs Under Section 40 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — MRT Order Restored. The court held that the legal heirs of a deceased tenant are entitled to be declared as tenants under Section 40 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, and that the MRT's finding of tenancy was based on evidence of cultivation and payment of rent.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the original tenant Namdev Jadhav, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 9t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners Under Right to Information Act, 2005 — Petitioner Alleges Vague Criteria and Lack of Judicial Expertise Violate Fundamental Rights. The Court Examines Whether Sections 12(5) and 15(5) Are Unconstitutional for Not Requiring Judicial Qualifications in Light of the Right to Information and Quasi-Judicial Functions.

1 Aug 2026

The petitioner, a public-spirited citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution directly before the Supreme Court, challenging t...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

16 Dec 2010

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)