Search Results for "CIDCO land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CIDCO land"

244 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 244 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Candidature for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Invalid Land Documents. Petitioner's land documents executed after application date were not valid, and her candidature could be considered under Group 3.

23 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Meenakshi Rajkumar Sonawane, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 29.06.2019 by which her candidature for allotme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Petrol Pumps Near Bibi Ka Maqbara Heritage Site. Court directs relocation of petrol pumps within 500 meters of the protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Heritage Regulations.

24 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Aslam, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking the removal of petrol pum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Application for Leave to Appeal in Property Title Dispute — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court held that the applicants, claiming through a subsequent purchaser, failed to demonstrate any prejudice or legal right affected by the decree in favour of the original plaintiff, and the application was barred by limitation.

21 Feb 2023

The judgment pertains to a civil application filed by third parties (Annasaheb and Ramesh Gandhale) seeking leave to appeal against a decree passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under MHADA Act — Petitioner's Construction Found Legal and Permissible. The Court held that the Competent Authority and Appellate Authority erred in ordering eviction without considering that the petitioner had constructed the plot with due permission and that the respondent failed to prove unauthorized occupation.

10 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Vachalabai Haribhau Lingayat, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Aurangaba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Deplorable Road Conditions and Pothole Deaths in Mumbai. Court Holds Right to Well-Maintained Roads as Fundamental Right Under Article 21 and Issues Mandatory Directions to Authorities.

13 Oct 2025

This suo motu public interest litigation was registered by the Bombay High Court in 2013 based on a letter from Justice G.S. Patel highlighting the pa...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Revision Against Trial Court’s Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Arising Out of Suit Challenging Municipal Demolition Notices. Suit Raises Question on Applicability of Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 433A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

21 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by a tenant occupying a shop structure in Nashik. The plaintiff claimed that the private defendants, who pur...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order for Unauthorized Construction by MHADA Tenant. Petitioner failed to prove that construction was within plot boundary or that MHADA lacked jurisdiction under Section 66 of MHADA Act, 1976.

10 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Maniram Satyanarayan Chaudhari, was allotted a tenement by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board (MHADA) on 19th November...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Cancelled Development Agreement — Agreement Cancelled Prior to Adjudication Not Liable to Stamp Duty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that stamp duty is chargeable on instruments, not on transactions, and a cancelled instrument cannot be subjected to duty.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Vikrant Vikas Raikar, proprietor of M/s. Elegant Constructions, challenged an order dated 16th March 2018 passed by the Chief Controll...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State and Municipal Corporation to Remove Unauthorized Religious Structures in Public Interest Litigation. Illegal Shrines Built After Supreme Court Cutoff Date Must Be Demolished Without Delay, and Older Structures Must Be Categorized for Regularization, Relocation, or Removal.

1 Oct 2016

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Society for Fast Justice and another petitioner highlighting the failure of the State of Maharashtra and t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the possibility of the detenu being released on bail and the impact of existing bail orders when passing a preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

23 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Mhaisarali Ramzanali Khan, challenged an order of detention dated 21 April 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sec...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)