Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Procedural Irregularities Such as Lack of Proposer and Seconder and Secret Ballot Demand Found Not Fatal to the Motion's Validity as Majority Rule Prevails.

The petitioners, Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Rahuwadi, were elected from a body of eleven members. On 3rd October 2023, seven members s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case — Caste Validity Certificate Issue Not Decided by Competent Authority, No Right to Speak in No-Confidence Meeting.

The petitioner, Yogini w/o Sanjay Deshmukh, was the elected Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mandawa. A no-confidence motion was initiated against her, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recall of Disqualification in Grampanchayat Election Expense Case. Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi Under Section 14B(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Balaji Ganpati Pawar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 23rd August 2008 passed by the Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Son's Encroachment on Government Land. The term 'person' under Section 14(1)(j3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 includes legal representatives of the encroacher.

The petitioner, Sau. Anita Laxman Junghare, was the Sarpanch and a member of Gram Panchayat, Nagapura. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 filed a complaint alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councillor for Having Three Children Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Family Planning Policy Enforced Strictly to Curb Population Explosion.

The petitioner, Gautam s/o Rama Latke, was elected as a Councillor from the Anala (30) Constituency of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. He was aggrieved by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion Despite Prior Resignation. Resignation Not Effective Until Approval by Panchayat Samiti, No Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Bapuso Rugge, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat, Tamdalge. He tendered his resignation on 17 August 2012, addressed to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Gram Panchayat's Petition Against Temple's Installation of CCTV Cameras. Right to Privacy and Security of Temple Upheld Over Panchayat's Claim of Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Gram Panchayat of Shani Shingnapur, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the respondent temple (Shri Shaneshwar Devasthan...