Search Results for "Advisory Board"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Advisory Board"

371 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 371 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Co-operative Society's Challenge to Reinstatement of Workmen Fails for Lack of Jurisdictional Error. The court upheld the Labour Court's award directing reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% back wages, finding no perversity or error of law warranting interference under Article 226.

7 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Indian Coffee Workers' Co-operative Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL for Rehabilitation of Abandoned Mining Areas in Netravali Wildlife Sanctuary. Court Directs Preparation and Implementation of Restoration Plan Using CAMPA and District Mineral Foundation Funds Under Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioners, the Wildlife of Netravali Wildlife Sanctuary through the Goa Foundation, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions for th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

25 Jun 2012

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Detenu's Writ Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act — Detention Order Quashed for Non-Application of Mind and Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. The court held that the detaining authority must consider whether ordinary law is sufficient and cannot mechanically pass a detention order when the detenu is already in custody.

13 May 2011

The petitioner, Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offende...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Dangerous Person. Detention Order Based on Past Criminal Activities and In-Camera Statements Upheld as Valid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

21 Oct 2010

The petitioner, brother of the detenue Surendra @ Surya Daulat Desai, challenged a detention order dated 15th March 2010 issued by the Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation and Inadequate Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's representation before confirming detention and that vague grounds violate Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

28 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Shri Sujit Suresh Menpal, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 7/10/2005 under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Due to Non-Compliance with Section 90(2) of Finance Act, 1998. Court holds that the Designated Authority must consider the declaration on merits and cannot reject it solely on the ground that the declarant had not paid the tax determined under the Scheme within the prescribed time.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Swam Mills Ltd., a composite textile mill, was served with 14 show cause notices for recovery of differential duty of approximate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Criminal Cases Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority did not consider material fact of acquittal in two criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Dadu Mangale, challenged a detention order dated 3/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 3(2)...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)