WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2019
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "registration rules"
4410 result(s) found
Found 4410 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Initiates Suo-Motu Contempt Proceedings Against Advocate and Notary for Unauthorised and Fraudulent Writ Petition Filing. Alleged Power of Attorney Holder Admits Authority Limited to Revenue Matters, Not Extending to Filing Writ Petitions, Prompting Scrutiny of Advocate and Notary Conduct.
18 Feb 2022The matter arose from an intervention application filed by Samina Arif Khan alias Dhanlaxmi Chandrakant Devrukhkar, who alleged that Advocate Rohan Ba...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Examined Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Fact Check Unit Provisions in IT Amendment Rules 2023. Petitioners Allege Violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), 21 and Ultra Vires of Section 79 and Section 87(2)(z),(zg) of Information Technology Act, 2000.
31 Jan 2024The judgment arose from a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. ...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows First Wife's Claim for Family Pension Over Invalid Second Marriage. Second Marriage Contracted Without Consent During Subsistence of First Marriage Held Void Under Goa Family Laws and Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, 1964.
24 Aug 2016The petitioner, Mrs. Banu Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking family pension as the legally wedded wife of the d...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging Lavasa Hill Station Project and Statutory Approvals. Petition Raises Issues of Compliance with Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Special Regulations for Hill Station Development, and Approval of Water Weirs on Varasgaon Dam Backwaters.
26 Feb 2022The judgment under consideration stems from a Public Interest Litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petitioner, a legal ...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty of Withholding 100% Pension and Gratuity in Service Matter — Disciplinary Authority's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Proportionality. The Court held that withholding entire pension and gratuity permanently is disproportionate and violative of principles of natural justice under Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.
17 Jan 2025The petitioner, a retired government servant, challenged an order dated 06.02.2023 passed by the Disciplinary Authority imposing a penalty of withhold...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition by BBMP Employees Challenging Promotion of Juniors Based on PUC Qualification. Senior Group D Employees Claim Discrimination as 2014 Clarification Exempted SSLC Holders from PUC Requirement for Promotion to Tax Inspector Posts.
12 Jul 2021The writ petition was filed by seventeen employees of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) working as Group D employees, challenging a promotion ...
- 20
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Execution Decree Holder to Seek Possession Against Third Party Resisters Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. The Court held that executing court can decide objections of third parties claiming independent title without requiring a separate suit, and amendment of execution petition is permissible to avoid multiplicity.
18 Dec 2020The case arises from a specific performance decree obtained by Ayyavoo Udayar (predecessor of appellants) against vendors (respondent nos. 3 and 4) fo...
- 564
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.
15 Oct 2025The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...
- 154
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows PETA's Petition Under Section 482 CrPC, Quashes Magistrate's Order Granting Interim Custody of Dogs to Accused in Animal Cruelty Case. Court holds that animals are victims, not property, and interim custody to accused is impermissible under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
24 Jun 2026The petitioner, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), India, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...
- 60
