Search Results for "prohibition officer"

2450 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2450 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Addresses Reference on APMC Election Eligibility of Gram Panchayat Members. Reference Pertains to Interpretation of Sections 13(1)(a)(ii) and 15 and Rule 36 for Former and Current Gram Panchayat Members.

The matter came before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, on a reference made by a learned Single Judge in a batch of writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Rampant Illegal Hoardings by Political and Religious Entities Across Maharashtra. Court Interprets Definition of Skysign and Requirement of Written Permission Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay was seized with a group of Public Interest Litigations and Writ Petitions raising serious concerns regarding th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Army Court Martial Case — Appointment of Junior Judge Advocate Without Recorded Reasons Invalidates Proceedings. High Court Correctly Set Aside Conviction and Dismissal Based on Charanjit Singh Gill Precedent.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the High Court of Punjab & Haryana's order setting aside the conviction and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.

The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...