Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused No.9 in Murder Case for Lack of Evidence of Criminal Conspiracy. The court held that mere suspicion or association is not enough to frame a charge under Section 120B IPC; there must be some material showing an agreement to commit the offence.

The applicant, Shashikant R. Kulkarni, was accused No.9 in Sessions Case No.27/2010 arising out of C.R. No.I220/2006 registered at Kalamboli police st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The appellant, Digambar s/o Pandurang Kadu, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Wife's Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies in Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Apparao Bahadurrao Ghuge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Family Members in Cheque Theft and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Only the Employee-Accused (Applicant No. 1) Faces Trial Under Sections 381, 468, 469, 471 read with 34 IPC.

The applicants, including Ashok Banarsi and his family members, challenged the order of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Food Safety Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors cannot be held liable under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 without specific averments of their role in the offence.

The petitioners, including a company and its erstwhile directors, challenged an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, which dismissed their ...