Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

2054 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2054 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Petition Challenging Executing Court's Order Permitting Judgment Debtor to Raise Pre-Decree Payment Defence. Pre-decree payments cannot be set up in execution under Section 47 CPC as they ought to have been raised in the suit.

The petitioner, Paackinindia, a registered partnership firm, obtained a decree in Special Summary Suit No. 58 of 2008 against the respondent, VSR Food...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 89 of MRTP Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Prior Civil Court Decree Declaring Petitioner as Lessee and Not Trespasser Bars Corporation from Issuing Notice Under Different Act

The petitioner, M/s. Iqbal & Brothers, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 2nd December 1997 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit, Finds No Forgery or Undue Influence. Sister Propounds Will of Deceased Brother; Wife's Challenge Fails as Execution and Attestation Proved Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The judgment concerns two testamentary suits arising from the death of Mahendra Premchand Shah. The petitioner in Testamentary Suit No.127 of 2010, Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Commissioner of Customs Can Disagree with Inquiry Officer's Report Under CHA Licensing Regulations, 2004 — Full Bench resolves conflict on scope of disciplinary authority's power to differ from subordinate officer's findings.

The petitioner, M/s. Delta Logistics, a partnership firm, was a licensed Customs House Agent (CHA) under the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal as Not Maintainable Due to Pecuniary Limit Under Section 102 CPC. Suit for Recovery of Rs. 23,466/- Barred by Amendment Act, 2002 as Value Does Not Exceed Rs. 25,000/-.

The plaintiffs, M/s Marine Crete (India), filed Special Civil Suit No. 65/1981/I for recovery of Rs. 23,466/- with interest. The trial court decreed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.

The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...