Search Results for "Inclusion"

1928 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1928 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electoral Roll Deletions for Lack of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners failed to avail statutory remedy under Section 22 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 before approaching High Court under Article 226.

The petitioners, 25 residents of Ashok Nagar, Dhamangaon Railway, Amravati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Objection Certificate for Society Redevelopment. Circular dated 3rd January 2009 under Section 79A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 held not mandatory but directory.

The Petitioner, a member of Navbharatiya Bhavan (1) Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd., challenged the order dated 1st November 2014 granting a No Objection Certif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection Process in District Beed Recruitment Due to Malpractices. Selection Committee Has Power to Cancel Vitiated Process Even If Some Candidates Are Innocent.

The petitioners, four individuals who were selected for clerical and Talathi posts in a recruitment process conducted by the District Selection Commit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Exclusion of Assistant Superintendent from Justice Shetty Commission Benefits. Government Resolution dated 8.3.2013 and letter dated 30.10.2014 quashed to the extent they exclude the petitioner from pay revision benefits.

The petitioner, Amanulla Khan Pathan, an Assistant Superintendent of Civil Court (Junior Division), Deoni, filed a writ petition challenging a letter ...