Search Results for "extension agreement"

1926 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1926 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Prior Termination of Arbitral Mandate. Court Holds That Right to Seek Appointment Is Not Extinguished by Termination Where Dispute Remains Unresolved.

The applicant, M/s. Strongwell Construction Company, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on limitation and quantum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 20 February 2009 passed by a s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — Upholds Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that challenge to award on merits is not permissible and that the arbitrator's findings are final on facts and law.

The Kolhapur Municipal Corporation (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Retirement Age of Workmen. Workmen who opted for NTC service conditions cannot claim retirement at 60 years under earlier settlement and award.

The petitioners, workmen of India United Mills, Mumbai, which was taken over by the National Textile Corporation under the Sick Textiles Undertakings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Partition Suit Appeal — Order I Rule 10 CPC. Subsequent purchaser held to be necessary and proper party to appeal under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioner, Sri Basavaraj @ Madhu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 20.12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020054492024_1

The petitioner, Smt. Baligar Chandbi, was appointed as a contract Accountant at Raitha Samparka Kendra, Huvinahadagali, through an outsourcing agency ...