COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024
2 May 2025...
Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"
1597 result(s) found
Found 1597 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Resolves Arbitration Jurisdiction Conflict in Partnership Dispute -- High Court Contradictory Orders on Arbitration Agreement Validity Set Aside -- Civil Suit Directed to Proceed for Determination of Admission Deed Validity
2 Feb 2026The Supreme Court resolved conflicting High Court orders regarding arbitration in a partnership dispute where the existence of the arbitration agreeme...
- 911
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Interim Relief Under Section 9. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction to Decide on Interim Measures Does Not Bar the Court from Granting Such Relief Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
14 Jan 2016The appeal was filed by the original petitioners, Birla International Pvt. Ltd. and Nirved Traders Pvt. Ltd., against the order of the learned Single ...
- 118
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Council Award for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Arbitration Procedure Under MSMED Act. Council's Order Without Proper Conciliation and Arbitration Proceedings Held Invalid.
15 Dec 2021The appellant, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, successor of Jharkhand State Electricity Board, entered into a contract with respondent No.3, M/s. ...
- 266
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.
6 Nov 2020The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
17 Sep 2012The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute, Holds That Allegations of Fraud Do Not Render Disputes Non-Arbitrable Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court sets aside Commercial Court order rejecting referral to arbitration, finding that fraud allegations must be directly related to arbitration agreement to oust jurisdiction.
28 Jul 2025The case involves a commercial dispute between Pira Scientific (OPC) Pvt. Limited and others (appellants) and Novo Nordisk India Private Limited and a...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitrator's Order That Certain Claims Were Beyond Scope of Reference. The Court Held That the Arbitrator Correctly Applied the Principle That Claims Not Covered by the Reference Cannot Be Adjudicated.
3 Sep 2013The appellant, Ameyas Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common or...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Notes and Liability Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.
24 Sep 2012The petitioner, Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an a...
- 121
High Court
- 21
