Search Results for "land title dispute"

3735 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3735 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land — Held That No Notice Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Is Required for Unauthorized Occupants and That Encroachment on Public Land Cannot Be Regularized.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different groups of petitioners challenging the demolition of their constructions on land belonging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Order Under Hyderabad Atiyat Inquiries Act, 1952; Final Decision Not Provided in Extracted Text. Petitioners Challenge Declaration of Mutawalli and Succession Rights for Hazarat Sayed Chand Dargah and Masjid, Udgir, and Possession of Survey Nos. 167 and 230.

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad heard a group of four writ petitions (Writ Petition Nos. 3735 of 2014, 6172 of 2014, 4957 of 2014, and 4047 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Mutation Dispute — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title, Remedy Lies Before Civil Court. Revenue authorities' mutation proceedings are fiscal inquiries and do not create legal rights; the petitioner must approach the civil court for title disputes.

The petitioner, Ibrahim Khan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) challenging an order passed by the Additional Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that findings of fact recorded by courts below based on evidence cannot be disturbed in appeal under Section 96 CPC unless perverse or contrary to material on record.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Suit for Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property.

The present Second Appeal was filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2025 passed by the learned Principal Distri...