WRIT PETITION NO. 482 OF 2015
22 Jul 2016...
Search Results for "contradictory statement"
1663 result(s) found
Found 1663 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Manager for Misconduct in Loan Sanctions. Disciplinary Proceedings Valid as Charges of Failing to Exercise Due Diligence and Integrity in Sanctioning Loans Were Established, and Penalty Not Disproportionate.
25 Oct 2016The petitioner, R.M. Yadav, was a Branch Manager at Bank of India's Agardanda branch. In 2003, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him for...
- 162
High Court
High Court of Bombay Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Manager in Disciplinary Proceedings — Charges of Financial Irregularities and Lack of Integrity Proven. The Court held that the disciplinary authority's findings were based on evidence and the penalty of compulsory retirement was proportionate to the misconduct under the Bank of India Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1976.
25 Oct 2016The petitioner, R.M. Yadav, was a Branch Manager at Bank of India's Agardanda branch. In 2003, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him bas...
- 111
High Court
High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay in Filing Review Petition. Limitation Act and Maharashtra Public Trusts Act Considered
2 Feb 2026The High Court dismissed an application seeking condonation of 645 days delay in filing a review petition against an order dated 6 February 2024 that ...
- 771
High Court
Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d)(1)(2)(3) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
22 Jan 2026The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.
10 Feb 2026The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019 where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...
- 328
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Case: CIRP Not a Substitute for Execution of Civil Court Decree. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 7 — Financial Debt — Decree Holder Cannot Bypass Execution Process.
23 Apr 2026The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against the order of the NCLAT which had directed admission of a Section 7 petition under the...
- 316
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Apr 2026The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...
- 185
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased Found to be Bonafide Passenger Based on Recovery of Tickets and Police Report.
4 May 2026The appeal was filed by the original applicants, who are dependents of the deceased Mr. Arogyaraj Chetiyar, challenging an order of the Railway Claims...
- 108
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Injured Witnesses Found Inconsistent and Contradictory, Leading to Benefit of Doubt to Accused.
9 Feb 2022The State of Karnataka, represented by the Arakere Police, filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, again...
- 180
