Search Results for "cheque payment"

1906 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1906 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Plaint Cannot Be Rejected After Framing of Issues. Suit for Specific Performance Under MOFA Not Barred by Limitation as Limitation is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact.

The appellant, Mrs. Sicily Varghese Kadamthottu, filed a suit for specific performance against the respondents, who were promoters under the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Proceedings and Contradictory Witness Testimony. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 8 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sri. Manjanna M.K., a Head Constable at Bagalagunte Police Station, was convicted by the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by actual delivery or proper postal endorsement; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The petitioner, Ananda Rao Kanthamaneni, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'No Cross' Order in NI Act Case — Right to Cross-Examine Cannot Be Denied Without Giving Opportunity. Accused's Right to Cross-Examine Complainant's Witness Is a Valuable Right and Cannot Be Extinguished by Defaulting on Costs.

The petitioner, original accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articl...