Search Results for "Partition deed"

1507 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1507 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Memo for Additional Issues in Suit for Partition and Injunction. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Memo Without Considering Its Merits and That the Memo Was Not Barred by Res Judicata or Constructive Res Judicata.

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in O.S. No.30/2007 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Gowribidanur, filed a suit for partition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Between Mother-in-Law and Daughter-in-Law. Trial Court Restrained Daughter-in-Law from Entering Suit Flat, Allegedly Circumventing Family Court's Order Protecting Her Right to Residence.

The appeal arose from an order dated 19.07.2014 passed by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, in Notice of Motion No.1959 of 2011 in S.C. Suit No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Interlocutory Applications in Property Dispute — Vacation of Status Quo Denied. Court holds that third-party rights cannot be adjudicated in pending special leave petition without proper impleadment and evidence.

The Supreme Court was hearing three interlocutory applications in a pending special leave petition. I.A. No.6484 of 2018 sought vacation or modificati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Execution Order in Redemption Suit — Execution Court Has Power to Decide Nullity Objection. Decree Passed by Competent Court Is Not a Nullity and Execution Can Proceed.

The petitioner, original defendant No. 2 in a suit for redemption, challenged an order dated 17 August 2018 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Case — Appellant Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period. The Court held that mere long possession without animus possidendi does not constitute adverse possession under Section 65 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a suit for possession filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against...