Search Results for "FIR Error"

2109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Customs Sepoy for Disproportionate Assets and Wife for Abetment. Assets worth ₹1.15 crore found disproportionate to known income; wife convicted for aiding acquisition under Section 109 IPC read with Prevention of Corruption Act.

The case involves two appeals by Suresh Vinayak Morajkar (a Sepoy in the Customs & Central Excise Department) and his wife Sushma Suresh Morajkar agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon held sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Jaiprakash Janbandhu, was convicted for the murder of his wife Yashodhara under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.3 in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, While Acquittal of Co-Accused Upheld for Lack of Evidence.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, dated 7th April 2003, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail Granted to Accused in NDPS Act False Implication Case — Complainant's Application Allowed Due to Serious Allegations of Conspiracy and Tampering of Evidence

The applicant, Rajesh Jaswantlal Solanki, filed two applications under Section 439 CrPC for cancellation of bail granted to the accused persons, Ravin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Eknath Pandurang Koli, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Special Case No. 26 of 2014 for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 506 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur in Sessions Case No. 75 of 199...