Search Results for "trial not barred"

3330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in HUF Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose on Alienation by Coparcener.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by Defendant No.6, a third-party purchaser, challenging the rejection of his application under Order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation in MRTP Act Notice Case — Notice Under Section 89 MRTP Act Held Valid and Not Barred by Limitation. The Court set aside the trial court decree declaring the notice invalid, finding that the notice was within limitation but the suit was premature.

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the oral ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Adoption Deed Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to establish adoption and possession within limitation period under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Ramning Ganesh Goankar, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Suits as Patents Were Revoked Prior to Filing. Summary Judgment Granted Under Order XIII-A CPC as Plaintiff Had No Locus Standi to Sue for Infringement of Revoked Patents.

The plaintiff, Bharat Bhogilal Patel, filed two suits for infringement of two patents granted in 2003. The defendants, TVS Electronics Ltd. and Kalelk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Fails to Prove Sole Ownership and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that appellant failed to establish exclusive title and that suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Namdeo Gangaram Mandalkar (since deceased, represented by his heirs), and the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Admitted a Batch of Appeals from Orders in Property-Related Disputes. The Specific Nature of the Dispute and the Court’s Directions Remain Unclear as the Judgment Text Was Truncated.

The judgment dated 12 December 2011 was delivered by Justice R.M. Borde of the High Court of Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction). The matter involve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Explanation — Section 468 CrPC Limitation Bars Prosecution for Offences Under Sections 498A, 494, 506 IPC Alleged After 24 Years.

The petitioner, Mahesh R., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the order of cognizance taken by the IV Additional Senior...