Search Results for "Reply Statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7274 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7274 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Inordinate Delay. The court held that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind and the delay of over two years in executing the order vitiated the detention.

22 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Naresh Dua, brother of the detenu Rajesh Dua, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Pre-suit Notice Under Section 164 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is Mandatory and Cannot Be Waived. The suit for recovery of money against a cooperative society was dismissed for want of mandatory pre-suit notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and the lower appellate court's reversal was set aside.

16 Jul 2010

The appellant, Jijamata Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a registered cooperative society, challenged the judgment and order dated 14.2.1994 passed in R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Detenu in Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act Case — Detention Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material. Court Held That the Subjective Satisfaction of the Detaining Authority Must Be Based on Relevant Material and That the Failure to Consider the Detenu's Bail Application and the Fact That He Was Already in Custody Vitiated the Detention Order.

15 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Aman @ Amaan Jamir Shaikh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Suit — Whirlpool's Registered Designs for Washing Machine Held Prima Facie Valid and Infringed by Videocon's 'Pebble' Model. The Court found that the Defendant's product was a clear imitation of the Plaintiff's registered designs, and the Plaintiff made out a strong prima facie case for protection.

27 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Whirlpool of India Ltd., a subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, filed a suit for design infringement against Videocon Industries Ltd. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Bar Under Order 2 Rule 2(3) CPC — Plaintiff Omitted to Sue for Relief in Previous Suit on Same Cause of Action Without Leave. The court held that the cause of action in both suits was identical, arising from the same term-sheet agreement, and the plaintiff's failure to seek specific performance in the earlier suit without leave barred the subsequent suit.

19 Aug 2014

The plaintiff, Govind B. Bajaj, filed Suit No. 186 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court seeking specific performance of a term-sheet agreement for joint d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Trademark Infringement Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiffs' claim for interim injunction rejected as they failed to establish prima facie case and balance of convenience.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiffs, Lokhandwala Construction Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Lokhandwala Builders Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...

High Court

High Court partly allowed Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case -- Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Upheld However order for imposition of cost set aside -- Petitioner Challenge to Conviction and Sentence Fails

27 Jan 2026

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act -- The petitioner was con...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Upholding Acquisition and Leasing for Public Purpose. Acquisition Completed Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Possession Taken in 2000, and 2013 Act Not Applicable Retrospectively, While Government Resolutions on Plot Allotment Do Not Apply After Ownership Extinguished.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute involved petitioners challenging the acquisition of 25.39 acres of their land in Survey No.210, Village Wakad, Pune, for a new town develo...

120 121 122 123 124

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)