Search Results for "Default bail"

1625 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1625 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Uttam Ramaji Shere, was a public servant working with the Mahatma Fule Backward Development Corporation, Akola. He was convicted by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt in Assault Case — Appellant Sentenced for Causing Death After Assault. Court Confirms Conviction Under Section 325 IPC for Grievous Hurt, Not Murder, as Death Was Not Intended but Resulted from Injuries.

The appellant, Sonu @ Khushal @ Tushar S/o Ashok Paswan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial No. 327/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Cruelty and Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of Rs.1,000 and that cruelty drove deceased to commit suicide.

The appellant, Ananta Laxman Pansare, was convicted by the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Udhav s/o Yadavrao Bhosale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.73/2001 for the offence punishable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves a criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder. The appellant, Feroz Khan s/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Consent and Promise of Marriage — Failure to Prove Ingredients of Rape Under Section 375 IPC. Evidence of Victim Contradictory and Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Prosecution Story.

The applicant, Pravin @ Shrikrishna Chandrakant Marathe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for offences under Sections 376, 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Abuse Case Due to Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 509 IPC and Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals filed by Suraj Nadkarni (Appellant No.1) and Dilesh Sambari (Appellant No.2) against their conviction by the Children's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and various sections of the Indian Penal Code. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Failure to Record Grounds of Belief and Inform Right to Search Before Magistrate or Gazetted Officer Renders Seizure Illegal.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The appell...