Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt in Assault Case — Appellant Sentenced for Causing Death After Assault. Court Confirms Conviction Under Section 325 IPC for Grievous Hurt, Not Murder, as Death Was Not Intended but Resulted from Injuries.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sonu @ Khushal @ Tushar S/o Ashok Paswan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial No. 327/2003 for offences under Sections 325 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The prosecution case was that on 25.2.2003, the appellant assaulted Indubai (the mother of PW2 Satish Lokhande) with a stick, causing grievous injuries. Indubai was admitted to the hospital and died on 1.3.2003 at 4:15 a.m. PW2 Satish lodged a report on 1.3.2003 at 7:15 a.m., leading to the registration of Crime No. 42/2003 under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was arrested, and investigation was conducted by PW10 Balasaheb Deolkar. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 325 IPC (grievous hurt) and Section 323 IPC (simple hurt), sentencing him to four years rigorous imprisonment and fine for the former, and fine for the latter. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, including medical testimony, and found that the injuries caused by the appellant were grievous and led to the death of Indubai. However, the court noted that there was no intention to cause death, and the conviction under Section 325 IPC was appropriate. The court also upheld the conviction under Section 323 IPC for causing simple hurt to the victim's son. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were confirmed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Grievous Hurt - Section 325 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction for causing grievous hurt leading to death - The appellant assaulted the victim with a stick, causing injuries that led to her death after hospitalization - The court held that the medical evidence clearly established that the injuries were grievous and sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature, but the absence of intention to cause death justified conviction under Section 325 IPC rather than Section 302 IPC (Paras 2-10).

B) Criminal Law - Simple Hurt - Section 323 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction for simple hurt - The appellant also caused simple injuries to the victim's son - The court upheld the conviction under Section 323 IPC based on the testimony of the injured witness (Paras 2-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 325 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the trial court are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Section 325 IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Grievous Hurt
  • Causing Death by Grievous Hurt
  • Medical Evidence
  • Intent
  • Knowledge
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (03) 143

Criminal Appeal No. 569 of 2004

2018-03-26

V. M. Deshpande

Mr. Nikhil R. Tekade for appellant, Mr. Amit A. Madiwale for respondent/State

Sonu @ Khushal @ Tushar S/o Ashok Paswan

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 323 and 325 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court for causing grievous hurt and simple hurt.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and sentenced him to imprisonment and fine.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 325 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient to prove grievous hurt. State argued that the medical evidence clearly established grievous injuries leading to death.

Ratio Decidendi

The medical evidence established that the injuries caused by the appellant were grievous and sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature, but the absence of intention to cause death justified conviction under Section 325 IPC rather than Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

In nut shell, the prosecution case is as under : The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, dated 29.7.2004 in Sessions Trial No. 327/2003.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, on 29.7.2004 in Sessions Trial No. 327/2003 for offences under Sections 323 and 325 IPC. He appealed to the High Court against the conviction and sentence.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 323, 325
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt in Assault Case — Appellant Sentenced for Causing Death After Assault. Court Confirms Conviction Under Section 325 IPC for Grievous Hurt, Not Murder, as Death Was Not Intended but Resulted from...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Against Tenant Not Party to Arbitration Agreement. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a third party who is not bound by the...