Search Results for "wife's right"

5973 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5973 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Allows Appeals of Convicted Accused in Murder Case Due to Untrustworthy Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction Under Section 302 Read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code Set Aside as Evidence of Interested Witnesses Failed to Inspire Confidence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, dealt with three criminal appeals arising out of a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appellant in Hindu Marriage Act Case Seeking Divorce on Ground of Mental Cruelty. Family Court's Order Granting Judicial Separation Set Aside as Finding of Cruelty Under Section 13(1)(i-a) Was Incompatible with Refusal to Grant Divorce.

The appeal arose from a matrimonial dispute under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The appellant husband and respondent wife married on 4 July 2014 at Ak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopalrao Dnyanobaji Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Amravati on 29/04/2019 in Sessions Case No.178/2016 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Dispute — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Lack of Application of Mind. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Injunction Granted Without Proper Consideration of Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss.

The appellant, Sri Yathievendra Naik @ Yathish, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Fails to Prove Sole Ownership and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that appellant failed to establish exclusive title and that suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Namdeo Gangaram Mandalkar (since deceased, represented by his heirs), and the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Challenging Tribunal's Absolution of Insurer and Inadequate Compensation. Claimants Argue That Insurer Failed to Prove Driving Licence Breach and Must Pay Under 'Pay and Recover' Principle of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeals arose from a motor vehicle accident on 30.06.2009 where a husband and wife on a motorcycle were hit by a rashly driven Light Goods Vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses/Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim—Decision Not Captured. Composite Negligence and Quantum of Compensation Under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Were the Key Issues.

The matter involves an appeal and cross-objections arising from the judgment and award dated 14th August 2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Company Law Dispute Over Maintainability of Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Nomination Under Section 72 of Companies Act, 2013 Vests Rights in Nominee, Excluding Legal Heirs from Claiming Shares for Petition Maintainability Under Sections 241 and 242.

The dispute arose from a family tussle following the death of Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal, who held significant shares in Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. and Oswal Gr...