Search Results for "tribunal’s findings"

4886 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4886 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claims — Truck Driver Held Solely Negligent, Insurance Company Liable. Compensation Enhanced by Applying Correct Multiplier and Adding Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeals were filed by the original claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, being aggrieved by the common judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Waqf Property. Court holds that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suit regarding waqf property in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995.

The applicant, Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Tax Appeal to ITAT for Fresh Adjudication Due to Erroneous Factual Findings. Revenue Expenditure Dispute Over Rs. 3.25 Crore Payment to Promoter Requires Re-examination by Tribunal.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) which had...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Insurer's Pay-and-Recover Liability in Motor Accident Claim Despite Dishonoured Cheque Premium. Insured's Contributory Negligence of 10% Affirmed for Deceased Not Holding Safety Bar While Travelling in Jeep.

The case arises from a motor vehicular accident involving a Jeep driven by respondent no.1, owned by respondent no.2 (the insured), and insured with r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Dismissal for Unauthorized Absence. Employer Failed to Prove Service of Charge-Sheet and Conduct Fair Inquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner-Company, M/s. Permanent Magnets Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 28.4.2004 passed by the learned Member of the Industrial ...