Search Results for "section 16(2)"

1432 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1432 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Criminal Writ Petition Against Remand Order in Assault on Advocate. Petitioner Alleges Violation of Fundamental Rights Due to Non-distinct Grounds of Arrest and Undue Influence on Remanding Court by Division Bench Order.

The judgment arises from a criminal writ petition filed by Dileep Loshan Mangesh Morje, who was arrested in connection with an FIR registered at Mandr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Decides Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Rioting. Court Examines Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and FIR Recording Delay.

The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur heard a criminal appeal against the conviction of six accused persons by the Sessions Court for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witness. Material Contradictions Between Ocular and Medical Evidence Justify Benefit of Doubt Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC.

The case arises from an incident on 22.08.1992 when the deceased, Singhara Singh, was driving a tractor with his son (PW1), wife, and maternal uncle (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Conviction in Fatal Jeep Accident Case Due to Unproven Medical Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. The court held that reversal of acquittal was unjustified when post-mortem report was not proved and only one eyewitness supported the prosecution.

The applicant, Anita Sopan Ravalekar, was initially acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhor, for offences under Sections 279, 304A, 337...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Conviction under Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Yogesh Arjun Maral, was convicted by the Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...