Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

3865 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3865 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications in Favor of Landowner Due to Lapse Under Section 11-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Award Made Beyond Two-Year Period from Section 6 Declaration Invalidates Entire Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioner, Mrs. Aienla Semelhago, challenged the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning the acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Lack of Proof of Income. Claimants failed to establish negligence of driver and income of deceased, leading to reduction in award.

The case involves multiple appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The accident occurred on 10.02.2014 when a motorcycle ridden by Devarajegowda ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Railway Encroachment on Private Land Without Acquisition. Petitioner's land used for railway line without acquisition proceedings; court orders compensation under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

The petitioner, Sumit S/o Ashokkumar Bharadiya, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad alleging that the Railway Authorities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Contractual Employees Against Municipal Corporation for Regularization and Equal Pay. Court Holds That Long-Term Contractual Workers Are Entitled to Consideration for Regularization Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by contractual employees of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation seeking regularization of their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Interest Case — No Interest on Delayed DCRG and CVP When Judicial Proceedings Were Pending at Retirement. Rule 4 of Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 disentitles commutation during pendency of judicial proceedings.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Chief General Manager, Gujarat Telecom Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and others against the judgment of the ...