KAHC030005792015_1
24 Apr 2020The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...
Search Results for "common law rights"
5408 result(s) found
Found 5408 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Passed Judgment in Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Considered Challenges by State and Landowners Against Reference Court's Compensation Determination for Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank.
24 Apr 2020The case involves multiple appeals and cross-objections filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code ...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
24 Apr 2020Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Decides Land Acquisition Compensation Appeals Pertaining to Kakhandaki Village Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank. The appeals challenged the Reference Court's determination of market value under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with both State and land losers seeking modification of the award.
24 Apr 2020The High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench heard a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising from land acquisition proceedings concerni...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.
24 Apr 2020In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench adjudicates multiple appeals and cross-objections under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning compensation for lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank in Kakhandaki Village. The dispute involves the correct determination of market value following the Reference Court's enhancement from the initial awards of the Land Acquisition Officer.
24 Apr 2020These appeals under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.
8 Dec 2016The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...
- 98
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Common Order on Writ Petitions Challenging Withdrawal of CBI Investigation Consent in Money Laundering Case. The Court examined the validity of State Government's orders withdrawing consent under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, in the context of an investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
29 Aug 2024The High Court of Karnataka heard two writ petitions challenging the State Government's orders dated 28.11.2023 and 22.12.2023 withdrawing consent for...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Revival of Defunct Tree Authorities in Goa Under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 — Failure to Conduct Tree Census for 37 Years Constitutes Dereliction of Statutory Duty. The court issued a writ of mandamus to ensure the Tree Authorities commence functioning, conduct a tree census, co-opt experts, and publish information under Section 4 of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
8 Jul 2021The petitioner, Living Heritage Foundation, an NGO, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa complaining that the Tree A...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Airport Authority's Demand for Vacant Possession of Premises. Lease Agreement for Flying Club Premises at Juhu Aerodrome Terminated Due to Non-Payment of Rent and Unauthorized Subletting.
24 Jan 2018The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Flying Club and its Honorary Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...
- 76
