Search Results for "IPC 506"

1966 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1966 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Delay in FIR and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ningappa S/o Basappa Cheliwadi, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in SC 125/2009 for the offence of rape un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Antilia Bomb Scare Case - Offences Bailable Under IPC Sections 120-B and 201. Appellant charged only with criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence, not under UAPA, entitling him to bail as a matter of right.

The appellant, Riyazuddin Hisamuddin Kazi, was arrested in connection with NIA RC 01/2021/NIA/MUM for offences under Sections 120-B and 201 IPC, arisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Shrikant Sukhdeo Borkar, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 376, 323, and 342 IPC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores FIR in Rape Case Against Employer: High Court's Quashing Set Aside for Exceeding Section 482 CrPC Powers. Allegations of Blackmail and Repeated Rape Require Investigation Despite Claim of Settlement and Consensual Relationship.

The Supreme Court set aside the Gujarat High Court's order quashing an FIR registered against the second respondent for offences under Sections 376, 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Repeated Rape and Criminal Intimidation Found Vague and Contradictory, Not Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Sections 366, 376(2)(n), 323, 504, 506, 341 IPC and Sections 3, 25 Arms Act.

The applicant, Dr. Avinash Manohar Warjurkar, accused no.1 in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2017 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, fi...