Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1591 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1591 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Family Settlement Matter. Dispute regarding implementation of Escrow Agent directions under Indenture of Family Settlement held arbitrable under Sections 5 and 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Jul 2011

The petitioners, Basant Lall Shaw and Arbind Kumar Jayaswal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Section 9 Application Under Arbitration Act — Partnership Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Clause 14 of Partnership Agreement Constitutes Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Aug 2012

The appellant, Shri Rama Krishna Kankonkar, filed an appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an order dated 01.10.2009 passed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Restores 18% Interest in Arbitration Award Under Section 31(7)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. State Amendment to Repealed Act of 1940 Cannot Apply to Proceedings Under 1996 Act.

8 Aug 2019

The appellant, M/s Shahi and Associates, a registered partnership firm, entered into an agreement dated 08.07.1993 with the Superintendent Engineer, D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 3.01 Crore with 18% Interest. Court holds that the Arbitrator's findings on liability and interest rate are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Mar 2019

This judgment arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Meenu Arora, Raj Kumar Arora, Ethics Exp...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Application for Appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The application pertained to a dispute arising from an agreement with an arbitration clause where the parties failed to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator.

18 Jun 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to MSME Facilitation Council Awards Against National Textile Corporation. Awards Upheld as Facilitation Council Had Jurisdiction Under MSMED Act and Awards Not Patently Illegal.

21 Mar 2023

The petitioner, National Textile Corporation Ltd., filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging awa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

8 Mar 2016

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Dec 2014

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

119 120 121 122 123

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)