Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

2035 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2035 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition for Injunction Against Auction of Barge in Admiralty Suit — Petitioners Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Ownership or Possession. The court held that the balance of convenience favored the respondents and no irreparable loss was shown.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Mrs. Mona Kapadia and Capt. Kenneth Khan against M/s Gammon India Limited and others, seeking to restrain t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Port Trust as Barred by Limitation Under Section 120 of Major Port Trust Act, 1963. Suit filed beyond six months from accrual of cause of action is not maintainable.

The plaintiff, American President Lines Ltd. and others, filed a suit against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (BPT) and Nahar Industrial E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Order Under MOFA. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance of land and building to the society, and disputes over balance FSI are civil matters.

The petitioners, a builder firm and its partners, challenged an order dated 5 May 2014 passed by the Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...