Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad Disposes of Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC; Examines Plea of Grave and Sudden Provocation

The appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad arose from the judgment and order dated 12.09.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. Notice Issued 15 Years After Final Declaration of Non-Surplus Status Quashed as Time-Barred and Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Mir Jamin Ali, filed a Writ Petition challenging a notice dated 23 May 1991 issued by the respondent State of Maharashtra under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating ST Certificate for Lack of Affinity Test. Caste Claim as 'Thakur' (ST) Upheld as Contemporaneous Documentary Evidence Outweighs Affinity Test Under Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Monika Sunil Shinde, a 19-year-old resident of Ahmednagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Transfer of Attached Property Void Under Section 64 CPC. Sale of Property by Judgment Debtor After Attachment Order Cannot Defeat Decree Holder's Right to Execute Decree.

The case arises from a First Appeal filed by Mrs. Meera Unnikrishnan, the decree holder, against the dismissal of her execution application by the Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows VIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Compensation Reduced from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare. Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land with 10% Deduction for Development Charges.

The case pertains to a land acquisition dispute where the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) appealed against the enhancement of compe...