Search Results for "High Court rules"

17076 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17076 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Former Employee for Defamatory Social Media Posts — Balance of Convenience Favors Plaintiff Company. Former Employee Restrained from Making Defamatory Statements Against Employer on Social Media Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellant, Mr. Arnaud Descamps, a former employee of OnMobile Global Limited (respondent), was employed from 09.01.2007 to 12.04.2013. The respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Educational Trust Challenging State Information Commission's Order to Disclose Information Under RTI Act. Personal Information Exception Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act Not Applicable as Information Relates to Public Activities of Trust.

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Education Society and its President, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3.7.2013 passed by the State Informa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Petition to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Divorce Case, Dismisses Wife's Petition for Certiorari. Family Court's Order Restoring Divorce Petition to File Set Aside Due to Lack of Notice to Husband.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions arising from a matrimonial dispute between Mr. Harmeet Singh (husband) and Mrs. Juliet Kukreja (wife). The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Judgment Debtor’s Liability to Pay Interest Clarified: Deposit in Appellate Court Does Not Cease Accrual of Interest" "Bombay High Court reiterates the conditions for cessation of interest under Order XXI, Rule 1 of CPC."

This case examines the cessation of interest on a decretal amount deposited by the judgment debtor in an appellate court, rather than the executing co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes One-Year Renewal of Stage Carriage Permits Under Section 58 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Renewal Period Must Conform to Original Permit Period, Minimum Three Years.

The case originated from the expiry of stage carriage permits held by the petitioners on March 31, 1958. They applied for renewal before the Regional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030058312022_1

...