Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1661 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1661 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Recovery Demand Against Swimming Centre for Lack of Authority. Demand for Rs. 1,93,73,184 for alleged excess water consumption set aside as BBMP lacked jurisdiction to levy such charges under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

The petitioner, M/S. PM Swimming Centre, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing MPID Act Attachment Against Corporate Debtor's Property. Section 32A IBC Overrides MPID Act as Property Acquired Prior to Offence and Corporate Debtor Not Accused.

The petitioner, Dwarka Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd., as the Successful Resolution Applicant of the corporate debtor M/s. Abhirama Steels Limited, filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Order Removing Lands from Mining Lease in Mineral Auction Dispute. Transfer of Mining Lease Valid Under Rule 22(6) of MCR 1960, State Cannot Unilaterally Excise Lease Area for Auction Without Following Due Process.

The petitioner, M/s. J.K. Cement Limited, held a mining lease (ML No. 2344A) over certain lands in Metagudda Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...