Search Results for "Cooperative Court jurisdiction"

2297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Territorial Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar in Co-operative Loan Recovery Proceedings Under Section 101 of MCS Act. Challenge Centres on Whether Loan Sanction at Head Office Confers Jurisdiction Despite Execution and Disbursement at Branch Office.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard five writ petitions challenging a common order dated 5 August 2020 passed by the Assistant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Consent Decree in Property Suit. Consent Decree Obtained by Fraud and Misrepresentation, Not Binding on Co-operative Society and Its Members.

The appeal arises from a long-standing property dispute. The appellant, Time Field Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a suit in 1978 against Shri ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Registrar's Order Due to Alternative Remedy of Statutory Appeal Under Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003. The Court Held That When an Efficacious Alternative Remedy Exists, Direct Appeal is Not Maintainable, and Granted Liberty to File Appeal Within 60 Days.

The Supreme Court disposed of two civil appeals arising from orders of the Registrar, Cooperative Societies under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Election Officer's Order Rejecting Nomination in Cooperative Society Election Due to Non-Application of Mind. Failure to Consider Objections and Provide Reasons Renders Order Invalid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, six fishermen and members of Ekattamik Matsyotpadan Vikas Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Kanhalgao (Ridhora), challenged an order passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Reinstatement of Bus Driver in Gross Negligence Case. The Industrial Court's finding that the bus driver was not negligent was based on evidence and not perverse, and thus no interference under Article 227 was warranted.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking), challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 16 August 2007,...