Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Euro Issue Expenditure Deduction Case — Expenditure Incurred for Raising Capital Abroad Held Deductible as Cost of Acquisition Under Section 48 of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Tax Deduction at Source Required Under Section 195 for Payments to Non-Residents for Services Rendered Outside India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 56
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 09.04.2009, which allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of expenditure incurred in connection with two Euro issues. The assessee, M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, had issued Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) in November 1993 and July 1996, raising US $74.75 million and US $100 million respectively. The assessee paid marketing, underwriting, and selling commission, as well as out-of-pocket expenses, to various non-resident entities, including M/s Banque Paribas. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction of these expenses, treating them as capital loss under Section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and also held that the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195 on payments to non-residents. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the expenditure was deductible as cost of acquisition under Section 48 or as business expenditure under Section 37(1), and that no tax was required to be deducted at source as the income did not accrue or arise in India. The High Court upheld the ITAT's order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The court reasoned that the expenditure was directly related to the acquisition of capital and was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. It further held that Section 195 applies only to payments chargeable to tax in India, and since the services were rendered outside India, no tax was deductible. The court also noted that the ITAT had correctly dismissed two of the four appeals as infructuous, as they were repetitive.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Deduction of Expenditure - Section 48 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Cost of Acquisition - The assessee incurred expenditure for raising capital through Euro issues, including marketing, underwriting, and selling commission. The court held that such expenditure is part of the cost of acquisition of the capital asset (shares) and is deductible under Section 48, not as a capital loss under Section 45(2). The expenditure was incurred to acquire the capital, and the cost of acquisition includes all expenses directly related to the acquisition. (Paras 1-10)

B) Income Tax - Deduction of Business Expenditure - Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Expenditure Wholly and Exclusively for Business - The court held that the expenditure incurred for the Euro issues was wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the assessee's business, as it was aimed at raising capital for business expansion. Therefore, it is deductible under Section 37(1) as a business expenditure. (Paras 11-15)

C) Income Tax - Tax Deduction at Source - Section 195 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Payments to Non-Residents - The court held that Section 195 applies only to payments to non-residents which are chargeable to tax in India. Since the services were rendered outside India and the income did not accrue or arise in India, there was no requirement to deduct tax at source. The assessee was not liable for any disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for failure to deduct tax. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the expenditure incurred by the assessee in connection with the Euro issues (marketing, underwriting, selling commission, and out-of-pocket expenses) is allowable as a deduction under Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as cost of acquisition, or whether it should be treated as a capital loss under Section 45(2); and whether the assessee was required to deduct tax at source under Section 195 on payments made to non-residents for services rendered outside India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT order. The court held that the expenditure incurred for the Euro issues is deductible as cost of acquisition under Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and that no tax was required to be deducted at source under Section 195 on payments to non-residents for services rendered outside India.

Law Points

  • Deduction of expenditure incurred for raising capital through Euro issues is allowable as cost of acquisition under Section 48 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • not as capital loss under Section 45(2)
  • expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business is deductible under Section 37(1)
  • Section 195 applies only to payments to non-residents which are chargeable to tax in India
  • no requirement to deduct tax at source on payments to non-residents for services rendered outside India if income is not deemed to accrue or arise in India.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014:BHC-OS:6655-DB

Income Tax Appeal No.3489 of 2009

2014-07-03

S.C. Dharmadhikari, B.P. Colabawalla

2014:BHC-OS:6655-DB

Mr.Suresh Kumar (for Appellant/Revenue), Mr.J.D.Mistry, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.Nishant Thakkar i/by Mint & Conferes (for Respondent/Assessee)

Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)

M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

The Revenue sought to set aside the ITAT order allowing deduction of Euro issue expenses and holding no tax deduction at source required.

Filing Reason

The Revenue was aggrieved by the ITAT order allowing the assessee's claim for deduction of expenditure incurred in connection with Euro issues and holding that no tax was deductible at source under Section 195.

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction and held that tax was deductible at source. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the assessee's appeal. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) order.

Issues

Whether the expenditure incurred by the assessee in connection with the Euro issues is allowable as a deduction under Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as cost of acquisition, or whether it should be treated as a capital loss under Section 45(2). Whether the assessee was required to deduct tax at source under Section 195 on payments made to non-residents for services rendered outside India.

Submissions/Arguments

The Revenue argued that the expenditure was in the nature of capital loss and not deductible under Section 48, and that the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195. The Assessee argued that the expenditure was part of the cost of acquisition of the capital asset and deductible under Section 48, and that no tax was deductible at source as the income did not accrue or arise in India.

Ratio Decidendi

Expenditure incurred for raising capital through Euro issues is part of the cost of acquisition of the capital asset and is deductible under Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 195 applies only to payments to non-residents which are chargeable to tax in India; if the income does not accrue or arise in India, no tax is deductible at source.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal held that out of four Appeals, the Income Tax Appeal Nos.2606/M/2000 and 2614/M/2000 are repetitive. They were filed as and by way of abundant caution. They need not be separately adjudicated. Therefore, these Appeals were dismissed as infructuous. The other two Appeals, namely, Income Tax Appeal Nos.2607/M/2000 and 2613/M/2000 were filed separately because they pertain to two Euro issues, namely, one in the Financial Year 1993 and other in 1996.

Procedural History

The Assessing Officer passed an order under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, disallowing deduction of Euro issue expenses and holding that tax was deductible at source. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who allowed the appeal on 01.03.2000. The Revenue appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which dismissed the Revenue's appeals on 09.04.2009. The Revenue then filed the present appeal under Section 260A before the High Court, which was dismissed on 03.07.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 260A, Section 195, Section 45(2), Section 48, Section 37(1), Section 40(a)(i)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Euro Issue Expenditure Deduction Case — Expenditure Incurred for Raising Capital Abroad Held Deductible as Cost of Acquisition Under Section 48 of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Tax Deduction at Source Requ...