Search Results for "wholly owned subsidiary"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contractual Employee of Government Company. Contractual Appointment Does Not Confer Right to Continue and Termination Without Stigma Does Not Violate Natural Justice.

The petitioner, S. Raghunathan, was appointed as Executive Director of National E-Governance Services Ltd (NESL), a government company, on a contractu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against GOL Offshore Ltd. Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Absence of Commercial Insolvency. Debt Not Due and Payable Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns two winding up petitions filed by Export-Import Bank of India and Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd. against GOL Offshore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Condominium Against Developer for Declaration of Rights Over Adjoining Plots as Barred by Limitation. Claims for Easement and Right of Way Held Time-Barred Under Articles 25, 65, and 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Plaintiffs, Beach Towers Condominium and its President, filed a suit in 2012 seeking declarations that they have a right of way and easement over ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Recall Application in CIRP Case. Appellant's Application for Recall of CIRP Commencement Order Was Not Maintainable as CIRP Had Progressed Significantly and Resolution Plan Approval Was Pending.

The appeal was filed by Parmesh Construction Company Ltd. challenging the order dated 04.12.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delh...