Search Results for "vessel registration"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Ganeshbhai S/o Appa Bhadane, was preventively detained by an order dated 30/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat, classify...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Bootlegger for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detenue Classified as Bootlegger Under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, but No Evidence of Disturbance to Public Order or Tranquility.

The petitioner, Nasimbanu @Aapa Gulhasan Mohamdsral Kureshi, was preventively detained by an order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs under the Prohibition Act does not establish a threat to public order.

The petitioner, Manvarsinh S/o Arjansinh Chauhan, was preventively detained by an order dated 15/01/2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Vav-Tharad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance — Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Routine Offences Without Link to Public Order

The petitioner, Vijaybhai @ Taklo Raghavram Sharma, through his father, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Rama Murubhai Chavda, through his brother, challenged a preventive detention order dated 13.01.2026 passed by the District Magistrate,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanically without application of mind.

The petitioner, Vijaybhai Ramshibhai Chudasama, through his uncle Bhaveshbhai Panchabhai Chudasama, challenged the legality and validity of a preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Preventive detention based on prohibition offences set aside as no evidence of threat to public order or tranquility.

The petitioner, Rajubhai Aalabhai Kodiyatar, filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court apprehending detention under the Gujar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order in Bootlegger Case for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Preventive detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Sunitaben Nileshbhai Chunara, through her husband Nileshbhai Arvindbhai Chunara, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeals in Advance Authorization IGST Exemption Case. The Court upholds the pre-import condition as a valid policy measure to prevent double benefit and cash blockage, reversing the Gujarat High Court's decision.

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment that set aside the mandatory 'pre-import condition' for claiming...