Search Results for "vendor's obligation"

229 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 229 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Recovery of Possession Case — Sale Deed Valid Despite Non-Execution of Rental Agreement. Plaintiff's title established through registered sale deed and possession handed over; defendant's denial of tenancy does not negate ownership.

The plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) filed a suit for recovery of possession and arrears of rent against the defendant. The plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Register Settlement Deed Due to Non-Application of Mind by Sub-Registrar. Sub-Registrar's Refusal Based on Missing Original Sale Deed and Non-Mutation of Revenue Records Held Invalid Under Section 35 of Registration Act, 1908.

The petitioner, Sorkathkani, and her husband purchased a property measuring 2.5 cents in Shenkottai Town through a registered sale deed dated 2003 (Do...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to allow a party to adduce additional evidence after closure of evidence.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The applicants, Ajeet Seeds Ltd., M/s Bhushan Agro Agencies, and M/s Bharatkumar Purushottam Potdar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Act — Society Entitled to Conveyance of Both Plots. District Registrar's Order Under Section 11 of MOFA Act, 1963 Upheld as Developer Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error.

The petitioners, M/s. Sawant Constructions, a partnership firm and developer, challenged an order dated 21 June 2013 passed by the District Deputy Reg...