Search Results for "tender fee"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision by Statutory Body in Suit for Accounts — Suit for Accounts Not Maintainable Against Statutory Body Without Contractual Right. Plaint Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC as Barred by Law.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Board (defendant) challenging an order of the Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Parcel Space Lease Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that claimant failed to prove termination of contract and is not entitled to refund of security deposit.

The petitioner, Prajapati Gunwant Keshavlal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals, Affirms Refund of Licence Fee and Differential Amount for Period of Unlawful Closure of Distillery Premises. Licensee Entitled to Refund When Premises Sealed Without Opportunity of Hearing, and Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the State of Bihar against a Patna High Court judgment directing refund of licence fee and differential amount ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Maintainability of Application Under Section 20 DV Act in Specific Relief Act Suit; Relying on Section 26, Court Holds Such Monetary Relief Can Be Sought in Any Pending Legal Proceeding

The dispute arose from a matrimonial conflict between the husband and wife, married in 1997, with two children. The wife had filed Petition B No.2/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim for 2% Contract Value Without Work Execution. Claim for facilitation fee under MOU fails as appellant did not perform any work for the contract awarded to the joint venture.

The appellant, M/s. Pratibha Industries Limited, filed a commercial appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Franchisee in IPL Termination Dispute. Court restrains BCCI from terminating franchise agreement and issuing fresh tender pending arbitration, holding that prima facie case and balance of convenience favor the franchisee.

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL), was the successful bidder for the Hyderabad franchise of the Indian Premier League (IPL) and en...