Search Results for "taxing provision interpretation"

357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals by Transport Authorities Against State Tourism Corporation's Tax Exemption Claim. Tourist Vehicles of Andhra Pradesh State Tourism Corporation Not Exempt from Tax Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Despite Notification Dated 22.03.1994.

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Assistant Regional Transport Officer and the Deputy Commissioner for Transports against an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09 Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts and Change of Opinion. Remuneration Paid to Directors Was Fully Disclosed and Examined During Original Assessment, So Reopening Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. OHM Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a share and stock broker, challenged notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Central Sales Tax Case — No Time Limit for Delivery Under Section 6(2) of CST Act. Circulars Imposing Timeframe for Taking Delivery from Carrier Quashed as Ultra Vires.

The Supreme Court dealt with four civil appeals involving a common question of law under Sections 3 and 6 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act)...