Search Results for "symbolic possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "symbolic possession"

232 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Land Allotment Policy for Cooperative Societies in Andhra Pradesh — Violation of Article 14 and Lack of Transparency. Preferential allotment of government land at basic rates to MPs, MLAs, Judges, AIS officers, and journalists held arbitrary and unconstitutional.

13 Dec 2024

The case involves cross appeals against a Division Bench judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 05.01.2010, which partly allowed writ petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court disposes of criminal writ petition and appeal concerning illegal occupation of flats by petitioner and family. The court considers the legality of the FIR and the order of the Special MPID Court in the context of SARFAESI and MPID proceedings.

27 Sep 2012

By this common judgment, the High Court disposed of Criminal Writ Petition No.2414 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.688 of 2006. The writ petitioner, In...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Bank's E-Auction and Withdrawal of OTS in SARFAESI Act Matter — No Writ of Mandamus to Compel Acceptance of One Time Settlement. The court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable against a private bank in contractual matters and that the bank's discretion to accept or reject an OTS cannot be compelled by writ.

14 Dec 2022

The petitioner, M/s Rima Transformers and Conductors Pvt Ltd, a private limited company, availed a credit facility of Rs. 18 crores from Canara Bank. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MIDC to Resume Possession of Plots from Company in Liquidation for Non-Payment of Rent. Lease Termination Upheld Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 — Permission Granted Under Section 446 for Resumption of Possession.

12 Mar 2024

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed an application seeking permission to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No....

Tribunals

NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeal by Former Directors Against Order to Cooperate with IRP and Hand Over Possession in CIRP under Section 10 IBC. Directors of Corporate Debtor are obligated to cooperate with IRP and hand over custody of premises and assets during CIRP.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeal was filed by Mr. M. Bhaskaran and Mr. M. Radhakrishnan, who were the opposite parties in IA(IBC)/913(CHE)/2025 before the National ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Resettlement Act — Acquisition Upheld as Possession Vested in Government and Section 48(1) Application Rejected. Court Held That Once Possession Is Taken and Award Is Passed, Government Cannot Withdraw Land From Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Ashok Shantinath Chougule, as legal heir of his deceased father Shantinath Dada Chougule, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Lease Claimants in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Welfare Legislation Overrides Equitable Rights. High Court's Order Setting Aside HPC Decision and Allowing Redevelopment Upheld as Slum Act Takes Precedence Over Prospective Lessees' Claims.

11 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal arising from a slum rehabilitation dispute in Mumbai. The appellants, legal representatives of Lullu Vas, claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

16 Jan 2015

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.

20 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)