Search Results for "rightful owner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "rightful owner"

300 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute — Appellants Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. The trial court's order granting temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was upheld as the respondents demonstrated possession and the appellants' remedy lay in filing a counterclaim.

22 Jul 2025

The appellants, Smt. A.Y. Sathyavathi, Sri. Sagar Gowda, and Smt. Anushka, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation in Property Dispute Over Open Space. Injunction Denied as Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Possession or Title Over Suit Premises Under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

18 May 2021

The appeal arose from an order dated 10.02.2021 of the City Civil Court at Dindoshi dismissing the Notice of Motion No. 438 of 2021 in L.C.Suit No. 14...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute — Exception for Defendants' Possession Set Aside. The Court held that the Plaintiff had made out a strong prima facie case and balance of convenience favoured an absolute injunction, setting aside the exception for the Second and Third Defendants.

19 Oct 2010

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge on a motion for interim relief in a suit for injunction. The Plaintiff, Variegate Realestat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Compensatory Appointment Despite Pending Civil Suit — Pendency of Civil Suit Regarding Title Does Not Bar Consideration of Rehabilitation Claim Under Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957.

27 Apr 2023

The petitioners, Mirabai Namdeo Gaurkar and her son Raju Namdeo Gaurkar, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 05-12-2020 from Weste...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Compensation for Excess Land Acquired Under National Highways Act, 1956. Re-measurement by Deputy Director of Land Records Revealed Additional Acquisition of 752 sq. mtrs., Court Directs Payment Within Three Months.

16 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Syed Azizuddin Hyder, owned 53 R of land in Gat No.109 at Chitte Pimpalgaon, Aurangabad. The respondents acquired 940 sq. mtrs. of thi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Shop. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Not Enforceable Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 17 of Registration Act, 1908.

25 Mar 2010

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed an appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Suit No.590 of 1980, whe...

Supreme Court

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

15 Jan 2026

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

High Court

Injunction Suit Not Maintainable When Title Is Disputed

14 Jan 2026

The High Court of Karnataka held that when title to immovable property is disputed, a suit for mere permanent or mandatory injunction is not maintaina...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Land Acquisition Arbitration — Upholds Solatium and Interest Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court affirms that land owners are entitled to solatium and statutory interest based on binding Supreme Court precedent.

3 Jul 2025

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Failure to Consider Adverse Possession and Limitation. The Court held that the trial court and first appellate court erred in not framing an issue on limitation and adverse possession despite evidence of long possession by the appellants, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

12 Mar 2020

The appellants, original defendants, filed a Second Appeal against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appellate court decreeing t...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)