Search Results for "prohibited distance"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Sanction. Decoy Trap Found Vitiated as Panch Witnesses Were Police Employees and Sanction for Prosecution Was Not Obtained Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Evidence of Last Seen Together and Recovery of Weapons Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of one person, where the appellants Suresh Thipmppa Shetty (A4) and Sadashiv Seena Salian (A2) were convicted under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Binding Precedent. Order of Commissioner for Cane Development set aside for being contrary to earlier court direction and lacking reasons.

The petitioners, M/S. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S. Shri. Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Previous Court Direction. Order passed without considering objections and contrary to earlier writ court direction to hear petitioners before granting licence to third party.

The petitioners, M/s. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s. Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice to Shift Stone Crusher Unit in Safer Zone Dispute — Licence Granted After Declaration of Safer Zone Cannot Be Revoked Under Section 6(1)(b) of Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011.

The petitioner, H.T. Manju, owned a stone crusher unit on private patta land in Haralahalli Village, Mandya District. He was granted a licence under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Enhances Compensation for Land Acquired for Road Construction. The court enhanced compensation from ₹52/- to ₹200/- per sq.mt. under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, considering location and amenities.

The appellant, Jacinto Baretto Miranda, owned land in Margao, Goa, which was acquired by the government for road construction. Possession was taken in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...