S.A. No.1043 of 2013
30 Jul 2026The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 17.06.1998 concerning agricultural land in Ernapuram Village, Salem ...
Search Results for "open delivery"
1759 result(s) found
Found 1759 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.
3 Sep 2024The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...
- 685
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.
14 Aug 2014Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Possession Under Specific Performance Decree — Executing Court Erred in Rejecting Application for Possession After Sale Deed Execution. The Court held that once a sale deed is executed in execution of a decree for specific performance, the decree-holder is entitled to possession under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC, and the Executing Court cannot go behind the decree.
9 Jul 2014The petitioner, Ramchandra Guja Rewatkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Executing Court that rejected his application for possessi...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Proceedings — Proceedings Deemed Abated Under Repeal Act Due to Non-Completion of Vesting. Landowners' Successors Entitled to Benefit of Section 3 of ULC Repeal Act, 1999 as Physical Possession Not Taken.
27 Apr 2026The petitioners, Zainulabedin Abdul Razzak Kokni and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging proceedings under the Urba...
- 137
Tribunals
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeals Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings. The Commission set aside the common order dated 11.09.2024 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of execution applications under Sections 25 and 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
7 Aug 2025The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard appeals (AE No. 73/2024 and AE No. 74/2024) filed by the complainant/decree holder, ...
- 319
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Shipment Date. Minor Deviation from Contract Date Does Not Render Award Perverse Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
21 Jan 2013The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Directing Execution Court to Follow Order 21 CPC for Judgment-Debtors' Objections to Consent Decree. The petition concerns execution of a consent eviction decree under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, where the judgment-debtors claimed the decree was void due to non-joinder of the landlord.
21 Jul 2017The petitioner, a monthly tenant of certain premises, sub-let the same to the respondent firm for running a school. Alleging unauthorized commercial u...
- 29
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Filed by Judgment Debtors Against Execution Orders Passed During Pendency of Appeal with Delay Condonation Application. Executing Court's Orders Set Aside and Possession Restored as Execution Proceedings Were Premature and Without Jurisdiction.
24 Feb 2026The present Civil Revision Petition was filed by the petitioners, who were defendants in O.S.No.54 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Valli...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.
9 Jun 2015The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...
- 96
