Search Results for "mandatory FIR"

1040 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1040 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act. Search Conducted Without Informing Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, Rendering Recovery Illegal.

The applicant, Dhanji Dubriya, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) in connection with F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court held that Section 308(7) BNS requires specific intent to cause death, which was absent as injuries were simple and on non-vital parts.

The applicants, Vikas Rajput and Dilip Gavit, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking release in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Impleadment of Company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments and company must be made accused.

The petitioners, Harry Inder Dhaul, Narayan Singh Pathania, and Mikhail s/o Harry Dhaul, were directors of Siddhayu Ayurvedic Research Foundation Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Private Company and Directors in Coal Scam Case, Upholds CBI Investigation. Post-Facto Consent Under Section 6 of DSPE Act Valid for Public Servants Not Named in FIR, Private Individuals Lack Locus to Challenge Investigation.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Allahabad High Court's order upholding CBI investigation in a coal scam case. The case arose from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Private Individuals in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. FIR Quashed as No Sanction Obtained for Prosecution of Public Servants, Making Proceedings Against Applicants for Conspiracy Not Maintainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...