Search Results for "male victim"

466 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 466 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Circumstantial Evidence of Identification and Discovery Forms Basis of Conviction Under Sections 376 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The matter arises out of a reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Minority. Conviction under Section 363 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's age below 18 years and absence of inducement.

The appellant, Saleem @ Mahammedsaleem, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-II, Dharwad in S.C. No. 101/2011 for the offence under Section 363 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape and Criminal Intimidation of Minor Daughter. Sentence of 5 Years RI Held Adequate; State's Appeal for Enhancement Dismissed.

The judgment arises from three connected proceedings: Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 2013 filed by the accused Madhukar Makaji Mudgul against his convicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 306 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhagwan Chintaman Thakre, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376, 306, 342, 323, 504 and 506 read with Sectio...