Search Results for "key answers"

256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Two Key Circumstances—Last Seen Together and Evasive Replies—Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vinod Kumar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his neighbour, Dharminder, and sentenced to life imprisonment. The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows PIL Seeking Scribe Facility for Person with Disability Without Benchmark Disability — Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Benchmark Disability Not a Precondition for Reasonable Accommodation in Examinations Under Sections 2(s), 2(t), 3, 16, 17, 20 of RPwD Act, 2016.

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, a person with 25% permanent disability due to Focal Hand Dystonia (Writer's Cramp), filed a Public Interest Litigation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for strangulating his wife due to suspicion of infidelity, with evidence of last seen together, unnatural conduct, and medical evidence confirming homicidal death.

The appellant, Kailas @ Kalyan Badrinath Pawar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 01-04-2016 in Sessions Case No.5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Overt Act. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC set aside as the only evidence of presence with a weapon was contradicted by key witnesses.

The appellant, Raj Kumar @ Suman, was convicted by the Sessions Court on 27th August 2003 for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves four criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 278 of 2016, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Challenged Woman Under Section 376(2)(l) IPC. Evidence of Victim's Mental Condition and Consistent Testimony of Witnesses Sufficient to Prove Forcible Sexual Intercourse.

The appellant, Raju Jaishriram Telgote, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot in Sessions Case No. 64/2015 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in POCSO Case — DNA Evidence Conclusive Despite Hostile Victim. Conviction Under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act Upheld as DNA Report Proved Appellant as Biological Father of Aborted Fetus of Mentally Retarded Minor.

The appellant, Shaktiman Sondawale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Sections 5...