Search Results for "illegal dismissal"

3330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Employee Not Entitled to Salary for Period of Unauthorised Absence Despite Subsequent Quashing of Termination Order.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Chief Regional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited against a judgment of the Allahabad High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Limitation Dispute Under Indore Municipal Act: Special Plea of Limitation Must Be Pleaded. Dismissal Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Not Protected by Limitation Under Section 135 of Indore Municipal Act, 1909.

The dispute involved an employee of the Municipal Corporation who was dismissed from service. The employee filed a suit seeking a declaration that his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Service Dispute — Time Spent in Labour Court Proceedings Can Be Excluded Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. Proceedings before Labour Court are civil proceedings for the purpose of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Jankiram Pandharinath Thorat, was a permanent employee of the Akot Municipal Council working as a Naka Mohrir on a monthly salary of Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Leave Encashment Entitlement During Dismissal Period in KSRTC. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Mysore State Road Transport Corporation Employees Leave Rules, 1964 and Whether Continuity of Service Grants Earned Leave Without Actual Duty.

The matter involved two writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka concerning the entitlement of a retired KSRTC workman to leave encashment fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Setting Aside of Termination Order Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Back Wages; Employee Must Show Willingness to Work.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by United India Insurance Company against a High Court order directing payment of salary to the respondent, Sir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Back Wages for Employee in Faulty Enquiry Case. Employer Directed to Pay Full Back Wages from Termination to Reinstatement Despite Option for De Novo Enquiry.

The petitioner, Manohar Pandit Marathe, was an employee of Sharda Vidya Prasarak Mandal. He was terminated from service on 20/01/2009. He challenged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement Order of Government Servant Under Rule 165-A as Not Dismissal and Not Requiring Compliance with Article 311(2) of the Constitution. Compulsory Retirement Order Upheld as Valid Under Rule 165-A, Service Rules Not Violative of Article 311(2).

The case involved a government servant who was compulsorily retired from service under Rule 165-A of the Bombay Civil Services Rules, as applicable to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition of Bank Manager Challenging Dismissal for Misconduct in KCC Loan Sanctions. The court upheld the penalty of dismissal as proportionate, finding no violation of natural justice in the disciplinary proceedings.

The petitioner, Mr. Avinash Sharad Dagaonkar, joined the Bank of India in 1983 as a clerk-cum-cashier and by 2010 was working as Senior Branch Manager...