KAHC010068412019_1
16 Aug 2019...
Search Results for "healthy environment"
184 result(s) found
Found 184 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores POCSO and IT Act Charges in Child Pornography Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Chargesheet Without Considering Presumption of Culpable Mental State. Possession of Child Pornographic Material, Even Without Intent to Distribute, Constitutes an Offence Under Section 15(1) of POCSO and Section 67B of IT Act.
23 Sep 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance and another child rights organization against the judgment of the Mad...
- 1294
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes NOC and Construction Licence for Non-Compliance with Land Conversion Requirements. Certificate of Existence of Structures Based on Mundkarial Huts Held Invalid to Avoid Conversion Fees Under Land Revenue Code.
16 Jul 2015The petitioners, Colva Civic and Consumer Forum, filed a writ petition challenging the NOC dated 28/3/2007 issued by the Deputy Town Planner (responde...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Industrial Incentive Dispute — Concessional Electricity Rate Not Available to Existing Enterprises Undergoing Substantial Expansion Under Himachal Pradesh Industrial Policy, 2019. The Court held that Clause 16(a) of the Industrial Policy applies only to new enterprises, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked to compel the State to provide incentives without an enabling notification.
25 May 2026The State of Himachal Pradesh and its departments appealed against the High Court's judgment that directed them to provide concessional electricity ra...
- 223
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Appeal Concerning Custody of Minor Child Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. Appeal challenges Family Court's order granting custody to father based on allegations of mother's adulterous conduct and welfare considerations.
31 Jan 2023The matter pertains to a first appeal filed under Section 47(c) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, challenging the judgment and decree dated 03.03....
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
7 Aug 2018The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.
31 Jan 2022The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...
- 563
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows PETA's Petition, Quashes Order Granting Interim Custody of Dogs to Accused in Animal Cruelty Case. Animal welfare organization has locus standi to challenge interim custody order; granting custody to accused would defeat purpose of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
24 Jun 2026The petitioner, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), India, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC (read with Section 528 BNS...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Restores Family Court's Order Granting Permanent Custody. The Court held that the High Court erred in substituting a shared custody arrangement without adequate consideration of the children's welfare under the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.
8 May 2024The case involves a custody dispute between a Colonel in the Indian Armed Forces (appellant) and his wife, a teacher (respondent), over their two mino...
- 1135
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.
4 May 2018The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...
- 50
